Myth 1 - I will not be made to feel guilt and shame for something I didn’t do
Individual Australians are not responsible and should not feel guilty. ‘Sorry’ does not have to
be an expression of shame or guilt. It can be an expression of empathy, as in ‘I’m sorry to
hear your friend died’ or ‘I’m sorry you got hurt in that car accident’. If people are still
confused on this front, they might recall that several years ago, John Howard apologised on
behalf on the nation to Vietnam Veterans for their poor treatment when they returned from
the war.
In any case the apology will not be made on behalf of the Australian people but rather limited
to the Australian Parliament.
Myth 2 – The Stolen Generations are a thing of the past
Of all the Stolen Generations myths, this is one of the biggest. The facts are that the removal
of Indigenous children continued well into the 1960s and early 1970s. These people are still
alive today and the effect on individuals, families and communities lasts a lifetime (and
beyond).
Myth 3 - Saying sorry won’t deliver better results in health, housing or education
Saying sorry is not of itself supposed to deliver health, housing and education. The
fundamental flaw of this particular objection is that it implies Australia can’t deliver practical
outcomes while simultaneously delivering symbolic gestures. In other words, it suggests we
can’t walk and chew gum at the same time.
The government must also pursue practical measures to address Indigenous disadvantage,
but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t begin the process with a symbolic act.
Myth 4 - It’ll cost us a fortune
Contrary to popular opinion, a national apology will have no legal impact on the capacity of
members of the Stolen Generations to seek compensation. The ability of members of the
Stolen Generations to pursue legal claims has existed since they were taken and nothing
changes that. As a nation, an apology costs us nothing.
Myth 5 - The people who performed the removals thought they were doing the right thing
Good people do things that turn out to be wrong – but that doesn’t mean they’re excused
from apologising. The majority of Indigenous children were removed from families not on the
basis of the level of their care - but simply because of the colour of their skin. Many kids
experienced physical, sexual and emotional abuse in their foster families and institutions after
they were removed. For those people who believe that forced removal actually benefited the
children – it’s pretty difficult to find a member of the Stolen Generations who is happy about
being denied the love of their parents and extended family.
Myth 6 - Saying sorry won’t change the past
Sadly, it won’t. But it will have a massive impact on the future – Stolen Generations
members have already started healing since the promise to apologise was announced. An
apology means an enormous amount to Indigenous people and the nation as a whole – and
will cost us nothing.
Myth 7 - Saying sorry just leads people to think everything’s been fixed
Whether you’re for or against it, anyone who thinks that everything will be ‘fixed’ with the
apology is kidding themselves. No-one is claiming that uttering the word ‘sorry’ is going to
solve all the problems facing Indigenous Australians. Whatever your view on the apology,
everyone agrees that practical actions still need to be taken. The apology is an important first
step.
Who are the stolen generations? The term ‘Stolen Generations’ refers to Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander Australians who were forcibly removed from their families and
communities by policies of government, welfare and church authorities as children and
placed into institutional care or with non-Indigenous foster families. The forced removal of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children began as early as the mid 1800s and
continued until the 1970s.
(http://www.reconcile.org.au/getsmart/pages/sorry/sorry--faq.php#1)
The apology? A central recommendation of the 1997 'Bringing Them Home' report was the
need for a national apology to those individuals and their families and communities affected
by past policies of removal. Members of the Stolen Generations have indicated that
recognition by the Government that the policies were wrong would help in addressing the
trauma and suffering that they have experienced. The need for a national apology is also
regarded as an important component of the broader reconciliation process between
Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.
(http://www.antar.org.au/content/view/112/1/)
Stolen Generation
Australia
No comments:
Post a Comment