Thursday, 14 July 2011

Murdoch’s Scandals - Institute for Public Accuracy @accuracy #murdoch #NOTW



CBS News reports: “A U.S. senator has urged an investigation into whether Rupert Murdoch’s U.K. newspapers, in the spotlight of a phone hacking and bribery scandal, had violated U.S. law.
“Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., called for the investigation after a report surfaced Monday that 9/11 victims may have been targeted by one of Murdoch’s papers, The Sun tabloid. The Mirror, a British competitor of The Sun, first reported the story.” In the U.S., Murdoch properties include Fox television networks, The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post.

KEVIN ZEESE, kbzeese at gmail.com

Zeese is attorney and spokesperson for the government accountability group Protect Our Elections, which is “urging the FBI and the SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] to launch parallel criminal and civil investigations into Rupert Murdoch’s media empire in the United States for possible prosecution under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in the wake of the phone-hacking scandal in the United Kingdom.”

Zeese wrote a letter Monday to the FBI and SEC describing the extent of the phone hacking as “staggering” and pointed to recent revelations by News Corp executives that its employees have engaged in “widespread obstruction of justice, bribery and destruction of evidence.”

“It is clear that News Corp has violated the [Foreign Corrupt Practices] Act on an industrial scale,” the letter said. “Rupert Murdoch moved to the U.S. and became an American citizen in 1985 in order to take advantage of our laws yet his company under his leadership has blatantly violated American law by bribing foreign officials in order to increase revenues.” Zeese appeared on the program Democracy Now this morning:

ANTONY LOEWENSTEIN, [16 hours ahead of U.S. ET] antloew at gmail.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/antloewenstein

Loewenstein is an independent journalist and author in Sydney, Australia. He recently appeared on Al-Jazeera English, stating that in his native Australia, Murdoch “Controls 70 percent of the print press. … There’s virtually no transparency between Murdoch’s empire and the political elite. … On a weekly basis, the Murdoch tabloids in Australia and around the world publish information that is ethically suspect.”

Background: Noted financial investigative reporter David Cay Johnston writes: “Over the past four years Murdoch’s U.S.-based News Corp. has made money on income taxes. Having earned $10.4 billion in profits, News Corp. would have been expected to pay $3.6 billion at the 35 percent corporate tax rate. Instead, it actually collected $4.8 billion in income tax refunds, all or nearly all from the U.S. government.” *

See FAIR blog: “Could Hack Scandal Spell Trouble for Murdoch’s U.S. TV Licenses?” and “Fox Media Show Skips Murdoch Scandal”

Also: Billy Bragg’s brand new song “Never Buy The Sun

* Correction: “How I misread News Corp’s taxes” by David Cay Johnston

 Subscribe in a reader

1 comment:

  1. Hi,

    I couldn't find an email address so I thought I'd post this here.

    I run the Daily Wire (an Australian political discussion forum & blog site - dailywire.com.au), and have recently put together a site to help fight against the tide of misinformation and obfuscation in our nation's media surrounding climate change and the government's plans to put a price on carbon. The site supports the government's plans, and can be found here - http://www.carbontax.net.au

    I'm wondering if you'd be willing to link to this site in your blogroll and perhaps refer to it in your latest post? I'm, of course, happy to post a reciprocal link in the site's blogroll.

    I plan to contact as many blog owners as I can and ask them to do the same. With what I know about search engine optimisation, there isn't much competition out there on carbon tax related keywords. If enough blogs link to the site, I'm certain it can climb very high in the Google rankings. The internet presents one major way we can bypass our short-sighted media.

    If you do feel like linking, the best anchor text to use in the link is "Carbon Tax", although you may find that not descriptive enough, in which case "Carbon Tax Facts" or "Carbon Tax Australia" would be good too. By anchor text, I mean the text that the html link tags are wrapped around, or the "name" of the site in your blogroll if you're using wordpress.

    I realise that the phrase "carbon tax" is contentious, and actually clarify the difference between a carbon tax and the government's plans on the site. However, as most people refer to it as the carbon tax, it's useful from a search engine perspective to target those keywords.

    If you have any questions or suggestions regarding the site, I'm all ears.

    Cheers,
    JJ Fiasson

    Email is jj.fiasson at gmail dot com

    ReplyDelete